Analisis Efektivitas Keterlibatan Mahasiswa Terhadap Tingkat Kepuasan Dalam Perkuliahan Kelas Hybrid
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62180/pqat7z35Keywords:
Keterlibatan Mahasiswa, Kepuasan Belajar, Metode PembelajaranAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh metode pembelajaran hybrid terhadap keterlibatan dan kepuasan mahasiswa di perguruan tinggi. Studi kuantitatif dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) melalui perangkat lunak LISREL. Sampel penelitian terdiri dari 151 mahasiswa aktif dari berbagai universitas di Indonesia, dipilih secara acak dan diukur menggunakan kuesioner dengan skala Likert 1-5. Variabel penelitian meliputi metode pembelajaran sebagai variabel independen, keterlibatan mahasiswa sebagai variabel mediasi, dan kepuasan mahasiswa sebagai variabel dependen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa metode hybrid memberikan fleksibilitas belajar, namun mahasiswa lebih menyukai pembelajaran tatap muka. Keterlibatan akademik terbukti memiliki peran signifikan sebagai mediator antara metode pembelajaran dan kepuasan mahasiswa. Nilai estimasi hubungan antar variabel menunjukkan pengaruh positif, dengan keterlibatan hybrid (LEH) memiliki kontribusi lebih tinggi (0,78) dibandingkan keterlibatan online (LEO) sebesar 0,27. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi teoritis dan praktis dalam memahami dinamika pembelajaran hybrid di perguruan tinggi.
Downloads
References
Alaulamie, L. A. (2014). Teaching presence, social presence, and cognitive presence as predictors of students' satisfaction in an online program at a Saudi University. Ohio University.
Amoroso, C. (2021). Hybrid by Choice. Increasing Engagement in a High Enrollment Course. Hybrid Pedagogy, 20 May.
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 1-24.
Carpenter, S. K., Witherby, A. E., & Tauber, S. K. (2020). On students’(mis) judgments of learning and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Applied research in Memory and cognition, 9(2), 137-151.
Fieger, P. (2012). Measuring Student Satisfaction from the Student Outcomes Survey. Technical Paper. National Centre for Vocational Education Research Ltd. PO Box 8288, Stational Arcade, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Fisher, R., Perényi, A., & Birdthistle, N. (2021). The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 97-113.
Gogiashvili, S. (2021). Stakeholders in Higher Education-Transforming for Development and Well-Being. THE JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2.
Gonzales, A. L., McCrory Calarco, J., & Lynch, T. (2020). Technology problems and student achievement gaps: A validation and extension of the technology maintenance construct. Communication research, 47(5), 750-770.
Jiang, J. J., & Klein, G. (2009). Expectation-confirmation theory: Capitalizing on descriptive power. In Handbook of research on contemporary theoretical models in information systems (pp. 384-401). IGI Global.
Kim, S., & Kim, D. J. (2021). Structural relationship of key factors for student satisfaction and achievement in asynchronous online learning. Sustainability, 13(12), 6734.
Kornpitack, P., & Sawmong, S. (2022). Empirical analysis of factors influencing student satisfaction with online learning systems during the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand. Heliyon, 8(3).
Li, X., Odhiambo, F. A., & Ocansey, D. K. W. (2023). The effect of students’ online learning experience on their satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of preference. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1095073.
Lodge, J. M., & Harrison, W. J. (2019). Focus: Attention science: The role of attention in learning in the digital age. The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 92(1), 21.
Prabowo, H., Ikhsan, R. B., & Yuniarty, Y. (2022, November). Student performance in online learning higher education: A preliminary research. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 7, p. 916721). Frontiers Media SA.
Raes, A. (2022). Exploring student and teacher experiences in hybrid learning environments: Does presence matter?. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(1), 138-159.
Raes, A., Vanneste, P., Pieters, M., Windey, I., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Depaepe, F. (2019). Unravelling Learning Engagement in the Hybrid Virtual Classroom. Proceedings of the European Distance and E-Learning Network, 310-319.
She, L., Ma, L., Jan, A., Sharif Nia, H., & Rahmatpour, P. (2021). Online learning satisfaction during COVID-19 pandemic among Chinese university students: the serial mediation model. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 743936.
Shi, H., & Lan, P. (2024, July). Exploring the factors influencing high school students’ deep learning of English in blended learning environments. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1339623). Frontiers Media SA.
Stephenson, C. R., Bonnes, S. L., Sawatsky, A. P., Richards, L. W., Schleck, C. D., Mandrekar, J. N., ... & Wittich, C. M. (2020). The relationship between learner engagement and teaching effectiveness: a novel assessment of student engagement in continuing medical education. BMC Medical Education, 20, 1-8.
Szopiński, T., & Bachnik, K. (2022). Student evaluation of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technological forecasting and social change, 174, 121203.
Van der Rijst, R., Guo, P., & Admiraal, W. (2023). Student engagement in hybrid approaches to teaching in higher education. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 41(2), 315-336.
Weitze, C. L., Ørngreen, R., & Levinsen, K. (2013, October). The global classroom video conferencing model and first evaluations. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on E-Learning: SKEMA Business School, Sophia Antipolis France, 30-31 October 2013 (pp. 503-510). Academic Conferences and Publishing International.
Yousaf, H. Q., Rehman, S., Ahmed, M., & Munawar, S. (2023). Investigating students’ satisfaction in online learning: the role of students’ interaction and engagement in universities. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 7104-7121.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dinda Mutiara Sabrina, Iwan Koswara, Ikhsan Fuady
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
