Sisi, Strategi, dan Substansi : Analisis Strategi Retorik oleh Kandidat Debat Pilkada Bengkulu 2024 berdasarkan Teori Fungsional Benoit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62180/g35zj547Keywords:
Content analysis, Pilkada Debate, Quantitative, Rhetorical Strategy, Functional TheoryAbstract
This research analyzes the rhetorical strategies in politics in the Bengkulu 2024 regional election debate according to William L. Benoit's functional theory which classifies campaign messages into three main functions: acclaim, attack, and defense, as well as two content focuses: policy and personal qualities. Quantitative method was used on content analysis through census technique on 1,585 utterances in the debate, this study explains that incumbent candidates tend to use acclaim, while challenger candidates tend to use attack based on functional hypothesis. Policy topics became the core focus rather than character, both by incumbent and challenger candidates. Chi-Square test results show an important relationship between candidate status and the rhetorical strategies and debate topics used. This research shows that local political debates remain focused on content and policy rather than personal conflict, and demonstrates that Benoit's functional theory is appropriate in the Indonesian political context. These results are important for understanding the dynamics of regional political communication and provide a starting point for political actors to design effective campaign strategies.
Downloads
References
Aalberg, T., & Jenssen, A. T. (2007). Do Television Debates In Multiparty Systems Affect Viewers? A Quasi‐ Experimental Study With First‐Time Voters. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(1), 115–135. Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/J.1467-9477.2007.00175.X
Airne, D., & Benoit, W. L. (2005). 2004 Illinois U.S. Senate Debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 49.
Ajilore, O. O. (2014). Acclaims, Attacks And Defences In Nigerian Gubernatorial Debate. Discourse & Communication, 9.
Alfarisi, M. R. Z. (2019, Oktober 7). Analisis Isi Fungsional Debat Pilpres Indonesia Tahun 2019. Universitas Padjadjaran. Https://Repository.Unpad.Ac.Id/Handle/Kandaga/210110150209
Benoit, W. L. (2000). A Functional Analysis Of Political Advertising Across Media, 1998. Communication Studies, 51(3), 274–295. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/10510970009388524
Benoit, W. L., & Brazeal, L. N. (2002). A Functional Analysis Of The 1988 Bush-Dukakis Presidential Debates. Argumentation And Advocacy.
Benoit, W. L., Blaney, J. R., & Pier, P. M. (1998). Campaign '96: A Functional Analysis Of Acclaiming, Attacking, And Defending Discourse. Albany: State University Of New York Press.
Bush, G., Jamieson, K. H., & Birdsell, D. S. (1990). Presidential Debates: The Challenge Of Creating An Informed Electorate. Journal Of American History, 77(1), 276. Https://Doi.Org/10.2307/2078669
Carlin, D. P., Howard, C., Stanfield, S., & Reynolds, L. (1991). The Effects Of Presidential Debate Formats On Clash: A Comparative Analysis. Argumentation And Advocacy, 27(3), 126–136. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/00028533.1991.11951517
Field, A. (2017). Discovering Statistics Using Ibm Spss Statistics, 5th Edition. In Sage Publications Ebooks. Http://Sro.Sussex.Ac.Uk/Id/Eprint/77862/
Fridkin, K. L., Kenney, P. J., Gershon, S. A., & Woodall, G. S. (2008). Spinning Debates: The Impact Of The News Media’s Coverage Of The Final 2004 Presidential Debate. The International Journal Of Press/Politics, 13(1), 29–51. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/1940161207312677
Hart, R. P., & Jarvis, S. E. (1997). Political Debate: Forms,Er Styles, And Media. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(8). Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0002764297040008010
Hidayah, A. U., & Kweldju, S. (2022). A Functional Approach To The 2019 Indonesian Presidential Debate. Jolla Journal Of Language Literature And Arts, 2(9), 1305–1317. Https://Doi.Org/10.17977/Um064v2i92022p1305-1317
Inglehart, R. F., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, And The Rise Of Populism: Economic Have-Nots And Cultural Backlash. Ssrn Electronic Journal. Https://Doi.Org/10.2139/Ssrn.2818659
Istianah, N. (2024). Discourse Of The Presidential Debate Of The Republic Of Indonesia In The 2024 Elections (Analysis Of Presidential Candidates' Discourse In The First, Third, And Fifth Debates). Social Science And Humanity Journal, 8(07). Https://Doi.Org/10.18535/Sshj.V8i07.1231
Istiani, R., & Puspita, D. (2020). Interactional Metadiscourse Used In Bloomberg International Debate. Linguistics And Literature Journal, 1.
Khan, A., & Ali, R. (2024, April 4). Unraveling Minds In The Digital Era: A Review On Mapping Mental Health Disorders Through Machine Learning Techniques Using Online Social Media. Social Network Analysis And Mining. 10.1007/S13278-024-01205-0
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis: An Introduction To Its Methodology. Https://Doi.Org/10.4135/9781071878781
Lascher, Jr., E. L. (1996, November). Assessing Legislative Deliberation: A Preface To Empirical Analysis. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 21(4). Https://Doi.Org/10.2307/440459
Lee, C., & Benoit, W. L. (2005). A Functional Analysis Of The 2002 Korean Presidential Debates. Asian Journal Of Communication.
Norris, P. (2004). Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules And Political Behavior. Choice Reviews Online, 42(02), 42–1232. Https://Doi.Org/10.5860/Choice.42-1232
Shelley, M., & Krippendorff, K. (1984). Content Analysis: An Introduction To Its Methodology. Journal Of The American Statistical Association, 79(385), 240. Https://Doi.Org/10.2307/2288384
Strömbäck, J., & Kiousis, S. (2011). Political Public Relations: Principles And Applications.
Suharto, T., Prasetyo, B. D., & Wulandari, M. P. (2020). Analisis Wacana Kritis Komunikasi Verbal Pada Debat Calon Gubernur Dan Wakil Gubernur Jawa Timur 2018. Linimasa: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 3(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.23969/Linimasa.V3i2.2639
Van Dijk, T. (2006). Politics, Ideology, And Discourse. In Elsevier Ebooks (Pp. 728–740). Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00722-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Febran Ihsanudin, Kunto Adi Wibowo, Ikhsan Fuady, Detta Rahmawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










