Conflict And Negotiation : Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62180/1msp8j06Keywords:
Conflict, Negotiation, Systematic Literature Review, Topic ModelingAbstract
Penelitian ini mengkaji tren akademik dan lanskap konseptual dari topik “conflict and negotiation” selama periode 2020 hingga 2025 dengan pendekatan Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Dari total 2467 artikel awal, sebanyak 429 artikel terpilih untuk dianalisis. Hasil menunjukkan penurunan konsisten dalam frekuensi publikasi dan keterkaitan tematik, yang diperkuat oleh prediksi time series. Kata kunci dominan seperti “negotiation”, “training”, dan “power” mencerminkan fokus pada dinamika negosiasi secara perilaku dan strategis. Pemodelan topik menunjukkan perubahan minat dalam lima tema utama, termasuk meningkatnya perhatian pada identitas dan resolusi strategis. Penelitian ini berkontribusi secara teoretis melalui integrasi pendekatan lintas-disiplin, serta praktis dalam memberikan wawasan bagi pembuat kebijakan dan praktisi manajemen konflik.
Downloads
References
Dorjee, T., & Ting‐Toomey, S. (2020). Understanding Intergroup Conflict Complexity: An Application of the Socioecological Framework and the Integrative Identity Negotiation Theory. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 13(3), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12190
Druckman, D. (2020a). Looking Back and Looking Forward in Negotiation and Conflict Research. International Negotiation, 25(1), 130–150. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-23031163
Druckman, D. (2020b). Thirty‐Five Years of Research on Turning Points: Insights Gained and Gaps to be Filled. Negotiation Journal, 36(2), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12316
Federer, J. P., Giannone, M., & Mandell, B. (2025). Introduction to Special Issue: Why It Worked: Redefining “Success” in Conflict Resolution and Peace Negotiations. Negotiation Journal, 41, 72–98. https://doi.org/10.1162/ngtn_e_00022
Federer, J. P., Giannone, M., Mandell, B., & Kogutt, E. (2025). Why It Worked: Moving from Success to Effectiveness in Conflict Resolution and Peace Negotiations. Negotiation Journal, 41, 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1162/ngtn_a_00018
Fleischer, J., Ayton, J., Riley, M., Binsted, K., Cowan, D. R., Fellows, A. M., Weiss, J. A., & Buckey, J. C. (2023). Web-Based, Interactive, Interest-Based Negotiation Training for Managing Conflict in Isolated Environments: Opportunistic Study With an e-Survey. JMIR Formative Research, 7. https://doi.org/10.2196/42214
Iwry, J. (2021). Open to Debate: Reducing Polarization by Approaching Political Argument as Negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 37(3), 361–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12370
Lipp, W. E., Smolinski, R., & Kesting, P. (2023). Beyond the First Offer: Decoding Negotiation Openings and Their Impact on Economic and Subjective Outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-023-09813-5
Lipp, W., Kesting, P., & Smolinski, R. (2023). “What is Your Best Price?”—An Experimental Study of an Alternative Negotiation Opening. Negotiation Journal, 39(2), 175–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12430
Maaravi, Y., Heller, B., & Levy, A. (2023). Low Power, First Offers, and Reservation Prices: Weak Negotiators are Self‐anchored by Their Own Alternatives. Negotiation Journal, 39(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12423
MAMATOĞLU, N., & KESKİN, S. (2022). ÇATIŞMA ÇÖZÜM VE MÜZAKERE EĞİTİM PROGRAMLARININ ETKİSİ. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 62(1), 263–295. https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2022.62.1.11
Mann, M., Warsitzka, M., Hüffmeier, J., & Trötschel, R. (2023). United we stand: a principle-based negotiation training for collective bargaining. International Journal of Conflict Management, 35(2), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-05-2023-0088
Muinao, A. B., & Ratnamala, V. (2023a). YouTube discourse of the Oting massacre in Nagaland: investigating affiliations, sentiments and Naga identity negotiation in YouTube comments. Media, War & Conflict, 17(2), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352231203632
Muinao, A. B., & Ratnamala, V. (2023b). YouTube discourse of the Oting massacre in Nagaland: investigating affiliations, sentiments and Naga identity negotiation in YouTube comments. Media, War & Conflict, 17(2), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352231203632
Ramirez-Marin, J. Y., Diaz, A. B., & Guzman, F. A. (2021). When anger and happiness generate concessions: investigating counterpart’s culture and negotiation intentions. International Journal of Conflict Management, 33(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-03-2021-0047
Shapiro, D. L., & Iwry, J. (2022). Worldviews in Conflict: Negotiating to Bridge the Divide. Negotiation Journal, 38(3), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12407
Sheikh, M. K. (2020). What Do Islamists Bring to the Negotiation Table? Religion and the Case of the Pakistani Taliban. International Negotiation, 25(3), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-25131251
Sheikh, M. K. (2022). Worldviews and Conflict Analysis. Negotiation Journal, 38(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12411
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pina Aulia Rahma, Putri Salwa Agustina, Dika Damayanti, Mada Aditia Wardhana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
