Conflict And Negotiation : Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Pina Aulia Rahma Universitas Mulia Author
  • Putri Salwa Agustina Universitas Mulia Author
  • Dika Damayanti Universitas Mulia Author
  • Mada Aditia Wardhana Universitas Mulia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62180/1msp8j06

Keywords:

Conflict, Negotiation, Systematic Literature Review, Topic Modeling

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji tren akademik dan lanskap konseptual dari topik “conflict and negotiation” selama periode 2020 hingga 2025 dengan pendekatan Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Dari total 2467 artikel awal, sebanyak 429 artikel terpilih untuk dianalisis. Hasil menunjukkan penurunan konsisten dalam frekuensi publikasi dan keterkaitan tematik, yang diperkuat oleh prediksi time series. Kata kunci dominan seperti “negotiation”, “training”, dan “power” mencerminkan fokus pada dinamika negosiasi secara perilaku dan strategis. Pemodelan topik menunjukkan perubahan minat dalam lima tema utama, termasuk meningkatnya perhatian pada identitas dan resolusi strategis. Penelitian ini berkontribusi secara teoretis melalui integrasi pendekatan lintas-disiplin, serta praktis dalam memberikan wawasan bagi pembuat kebijakan dan praktisi manajemen konflik.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dorjee, T., & Ting‐Toomey, S. (2020). Understanding Intergroup Conflict Complexity: An Application of the Socioecological Framework and the Integrative Identity Negotiation Theory. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 13(3), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12190

Druckman, D. (2020a). Looking Back and Looking Forward in Negotiation and Conflict Research. International Negotiation, 25(1), 130–150. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-23031163

Druckman, D. (2020b). Thirty‐Five Years of Research on Turning Points: Insights Gained and Gaps to be Filled. Negotiation Journal, 36(2), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12316

Federer, J. P., Giannone, M., & Mandell, B. (2025). Introduction to Special Issue: Why It Worked: Redefining “Success” in Conflict Resolution and Peace Negotiations. Negotiation Journal, 41, 72–98. https://doi.org/10.1162/ngtn_e_00022

Federer, J. P., Giannone, M., Mandell, B., & Kogutt, E. (2025). Why It Worked: Moving from Success to Effectiveness in Conflict Resolution and Peace Negotiations. Negotiation Journal, 41, 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1162/ngtn_a_00018

Fleischer, J., Ayton, J., Riley, M., Binsted, K., Cowan, D. R., Fellows, A. M., Weiss, J. A., & Buckey, J. C. (2023). Web-Based, Interactive, Interest-Based Negotiation Training for Managing Conflict in Isolated Environments: Opportunistic Study With an e-Survey. JMIR Formative Research, 7. https://doi.org/10.2196/42214

Iwry, J. (2021). Open to Debate: Reducing Polarization by Approaching Political Argument as Negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 37(3), 361–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12370

Lipp, W. E., Smolinski, R., & Kesting, P. (2023). Beyond the First Offer: Decoding Negotiation Openings and Their Impact on Economic and Subjective Outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-023-09813-5

Lipp, W., Kesting, P., & Smolinski, R. (2023). “What is Your Best Price?”—An Experimental Study of an Alternative Negotiation Opening. Negotiation Journal, 39(2), 175–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12430

Maaravi, Y., Heller, B., & Levy, A. (2023). Low Power, First Offers, and Reservation Prices: Weak Negotiators are Self‐anchored by Their Own Alternatives. Negotiation Journal, 39(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12423

MAMATOĞLU, N., & KESKİN, S. (2022). ÇATIŞMA ÇÖZÜM VE MÜZAKERE EĞİTİM PROGRAMLARININ ETKİSİ. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 62(1), 263–295. https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2022.62.1.11

Mann, M., Warsitzka, M., Hüffmeier, J., & Trötschel, R. (2023). United we stand: a principle-based negotiation training for collective bargaining. International Journal of Conflict Management, 35(2), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-05-2023-0088

Muinao, A. B., & Ratnamala, V. (2023a). YouTube discourse of the Oting massacre in Nagaland: investigating affiliations, sentiments and Naga identity negotiation in YouTube comments. Media, War & Conflict, 17(2), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352231203632

Muinao, A. B., & Ratnamala, V. (2023b). YouTube discourse of the Oting massacre in Nagaland: investigating affiliations, sentiments and Naga identity negotiation in YouTube comments. Media, War & Conflict, 17(2), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352231203632

Ramirez-Marin, J. Y., Diaz, A. B., & Guzman, F. A. (2021). When anger and happiness generate concessions: investigating counterpart’s culture and negotiation intentions. International Journal of Conflict Management, 33(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-03-2021-0047

Shapiro, D. L., & Iwry, J. (2022). Worldviews in Conflict: Negotiating to Bridge the Divide. Negotiation Journal, 38(3), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12407

Sheikh, M. K. (2020). What Do Islamists Bring to the Negotiation Table? Religion and the Case of the Pakistani Taliban. International Negotiation, 25(3), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-25131251

Sheikh, M. K. (2022). Worldviews and Conflict Analysis. Negotiation Journal, 38(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12411

Downloads

Published

2025-07-01

How to Cite

Conflict And Negotiation : Systematic Literature Review. (2025). HUMANUS : Jurnal Sosiohumaniora Nusantara, 2(3), 383-392. https://doi.org/10.62180/1msp8j06

Similar Articles

1-10 of 13

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.